In a recent survey, 35% of SMEs said there was “no real link between what they have to do for health and safety and actually keeping employees safe”.

However, while it’s true that some businesses are inherently higher risk than others, barely a week goes by without a serious incident or fatality to remind us just how devastating the consequences of poor health and safety practices can be.

September 2019 saw the following five high fines for health and safety failings.

1. Energy giant’s uncontrolled oil leak

Multinational oil and gas company BP has received a six-figure fine after spilling almost four tonnes of “extremely flammable” crude oil in 2012.

The spill took place during maintenance work on a pipeline at the Sullom Voe terminal in Shetland. A hose had been connected to a valve on the pipe to allow drainage into a manhole. However, the hose was not securely fixed to the manhole. After draining out water, unstabilised crude oil flowed through the hose at high pressure, causing it to come out of the manhole and the “loss of containment”.

BP admitted that the “major incident” should never have happened. The company estimate that more than 29 barrels of crude oil was released onto the ground before the spill was noticed.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the company had failed to:

  • Take all necessary measures to prevent the incident and limit its consequences to people and the environment; and
  • Identify and assess the hazards and risks arising from the maintenance work.

BP’s failings led to the uncontrolled release, a risk of exposure to unstable oil, gases and vapours, and a risk of fire.

BP Exploration Operating Company Limited pleaded guilty to breaching the Control of Major Accidents Hazards Regulations 1999 and Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined £400,000.

A company spokesperson said: “BP’s operations are underpinned by a relentless focus on safety and risk management. Regrettably, on this occasion in 2012, we fell short of these high standards”.

"This incident could so easily have been avoided by simply carrying out correct control measures and safe working practices. Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards."

HSE

2. Port operator’s poorly-planned loading operation

A port operator has been sentenced after a worker was severely injured in a lift and load operation.

Three agency workers were loading long bundles of steel onto HGV flatbed trailers. The injured worker was acting as banksman while colleagues operated two forklifts in a tandem lift manoeuvre. A single bundle of rebar weighing nearly two tonnes was suspended on the forks of the forklifts when it was struck by a reversing HGV’s headboard. The bundle fell onto the banksman who was stood on the far side of the HGV’s cab.

HSE investigators found:

  • No suitable risk assessment of the hazards arising from loading steel bundles onto reversing flatbed trailers had been carried out.
  • The tandem lifting operation was not properly planned, supervised or carried out in a safe way, nor had any other, safer method of completing the lifting operation been considered.

Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited pleaded guilty to breaching the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined £300,000 with costs of £7,593.

"Those in control of work have a responsibility to ensure they provide safe methods of working and a safe working environment. If suitable controls had been in place, the serious physical injuries sustained by this worker could easily have been prevented."

HSE

3. Two to blame for worker’s fall from height

A construction company and roofing subcontractor have both been fined for their part in health and safety failings that saw a worker fall through a fragile mesh roof.

The injured worker had been installing a roof on a drive-thru restaurant. In moving materials on the roof, he stepped backwards onto nearby fragile roof mesh that was not loadbearing, falling some three metres.

An investigation by the HSE found that:

  • In failing to prevent access to the fragile mesh, the roofing contractor had not safely planned and carried out the work at height.
  • The principal contractor had failed to plan, manage or monitor the roof’s construction without risk to safety.

PDR Construction Limited pleaded guilty to breaching the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. It was fined £225,000 plus £8,000 in costs.

Metcalfe Roofing & Building Services Limited pleaded guilty to breaching the Work at Height Regulations 2005. It was fined £2,000.

"This incident highlights the importance of thorough risk assessment, appropriate planning and adhering to a safe system of work that is regularly monitored and managed by those in control of that work."

HSE

4. Council fined over HAVs failings

A local authority was fined for exposing workers to hand arm vibration (HAVS) after excessive use of power tools. The affected employees worked in the council’s grounds maintenance and street care team.

An investigation by the HSE was sparked after seven HAVS cases were reported under RIDDOR.

Investigators found that the council had failed in its duty to:

  • Identify the risks from HAVS in relation to the power tools used;
  • Adequately plan working methods to prevent HAVS;
  • Properly train or inform employees on the potential HAVS risks to health;
  • Limit the duration or magnitude of exposure to vibration; and
  • Put in place suitable health surveillance to identify problems at any early stage.

Dacorum Borough Council pleaded guilty to breaching the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005. It was fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £28,672.

"This was a case of the council failing to identify the risk from hand arm vibration, which is a recognised health risk with potentially disabling consequences. Unless vibration is identified and properly assessed, an employer won’t know the level of risk and whether action is needed to protect workers."

HSE

HAVS is caused by the transfer of vibration through a worker’s hands and arms. Nerve damage and restricted blood flow to the hand and fingers can result. The HSE estimates that there are two million workers at HAVS risk and currently 288,000 sufferers in the UK.

5. Fatal lifting operation

An engineering company was fined after a worker was fatally struck on the head during a lifting operation.

The worker was helping a colleague to move pipes from one side of a fabrication yard to another. The men had decided the pipes should be lifted at one end using a side-loader. However, a lifted pipe rolled off the loader’s forks and fell on to a wooden support post. This sent the post into the air, striking the on the head. Shocking CCTV footage showed the wooden support moved with such force that it was catapulted over a high fence.

A HSE investigation found that the work method used to lift and move the pipes was unsafe. There was no means to secure the pipe to the side-loader’s forks once lifted. This meant that the operator had no control over the pipe when it began to roll along the forks.

IODS Pipe Cad Limited pleaded guilty to breaching the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined £60,000.

"This tragic incident could so easily have been avoided by simply carrying out correct control measures and safe working practices. Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards."

HSE

Reduce your risk of fines and prosecution

With 147 workplace fatalities in Great Britain in 2018/19 and fines having increased 450% since tougher sentencing guidelines were introduced, it’s essential that employers receive the right health and safety support to avoid tragic and costly mistakes.

Owing to the quality of our advice, practical hands-on support and robust safety management systems, Ellis Whittam reduce the risk of prosecution by c.50% and the cost of any fine imposed by more than 85%.

Speak to us today about how support from a dedicated Health & Safety specialist will help to safeguard your business against financial and reputational risk. Call 0124 464 6164 or request a free consultation using the button below

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Get your FREE download

We combine the service quality of a law firm with the certainty of fixed-fee services to provide expert, solutions-focused Employment LawHR and Health & Safety support tailored to employers.

Call us on 0345 226 8393.

Find what you were looking for?

Our FREE resources library contains over 200 searchable blogs, guides and templates focused around Employment Law and Health & Safety issues that employers face on a day-to-day basis.

Get your FREE download

We combine the service quality of a law firm with the certainty of fixed-fee services to provide expert, solutions-focused Employment LawHR and Health & Safety support tailored to employers.

Call us on 0345 226 8393.

Need some help?

Call our team now on:

0345 226 8393

Already tied in with another provider? We make switching easy.

Our unique Transitional Period Support makes moving to WorkNest smooth and risk-free. When you sign up with us, you can begin running down the clock with your previous supplier while bringing any new matters to us, and for all queries you can rest assured that all advice will be indemnified.

Even better, your payments with WorkNest won’t start until they have stopped with your existing provider.

Enter the details of your provider and renewal date below, so we can contact you closer to the time with a competitive proposal. 

Request a callback

Submit your details and one of our team will be in touch.

Request a Callback

Submit your details and one of our team will be in touch. Or call us on 0345 226 8393.

Get your FREE consultation

Submit your details and one of our team will be in touch.